Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js
pdf icon
Volume 13 (2017) Article 19 pp. 1-51
APPROX-RANDOM 2015 Special Issue
Improved NP-Inapproximability for 2-Variable Linear Equations
Received: December 25, 2015
Revised: October 25, 2016
Published: December 24, 2017
Download article from ToC site:
[PDF (482K)] [PS (3389K)] [Source ZIP]
Keywords: approximability, unique games, gadget, linear programming
ACM Classification: F.1.3, F.2.2, G.1.6
AMS Classification: 68Q17, 68Q25

Abstract: [Plain Text Version]

\newcommand{\twolin}{2\textnormal{-Lin}(2)\xspace} \newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon} \newcommand{\NP}{\textsf{NP}}

An instance of the 2-\text{Lin}(2) problem is a system of equations of the form “x_i + x_j = b \pmod{2}.” Given such a system in which it is possible to satisfy all but an \eps fraction of the equations, we show it is \NP-hard to satisfy all but a C \eps fraction of equations, for any C < {11}/{8} = 1.375 (and any 0 < \eps \leq 1/8). The previous best result, standing for over 15 years, had {5}/{4} in place of {11}/{8}. Our result provides the best known \NP-hardness even for the \text{Unique-Games} problem, and it also holds for the special case of \text{Max-Cut}. The precise factor {11}/{8} is unlikely to be best possible; we also give a conjecture concerning analysis of Boolean functions which, if true, would yield a larger hardness factor of {3}/{2}.

Our proof is by a modified gadget reduction from a pairwise-independent predicate. We also show an inherent limitation to this type of gadget reduction. In particular, any such reduction can never establish a hardness factor C greater than 2.54. Previously, no such limitations on gadget reductions was known.

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (APPROX 2015).